A recent report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) here in the United States has confirmed what I think a lot of us in the field have suspected for awhile. While the above link is to the report itself, you can click here for another summary of the report by Disability Scoop.
First, the rate of autism has increased from 1 in 59 to 1 in 54. The CDC believes that this is more than likely due to the increase of identifying and diagnosing.
When it comes to racial breakdown, the report states that for the first time, the rate of prevalence is the same for white and black children. This seemingly debunks a long-held mindset within my own community that “blacks don’t get autism.”
Now, the differences pop up when it comes to the age of diagnosis. While black children have made minimal gains here (meaning that they’re starting to get diagnosed more), they are still behind their white counterparts with regards to the age of diagnosis and start of services (meaning they are still getting diagnosed later). Worse still, hispanic children are behind both white and black children with regards to diagnosis.
Another difference is the access to services and early intervention. The report mentions that there continues to be a gap between services obtained by white families and services obtained by minority families. The age at which these services are obtained also appear to be different, with white families getting a diagnosis and early intervention sooner.
One of the goals of SPARC is to minimize these gaps. So, tell us: what would you want to see from SPARC to help bridge these gaps?
We need to talk about this.
Being African-American and working in the autism field, I have certainly noticed that there are very few of my race that I have treated and worked with in my decade in the field. In fact, I can count the number of black clients that I’ve had on one hand. It begs the question of why. This study I read about today starts to shed light on this question.
In the article about the study (both are linked below), “white parents were 2.61 times more likely to report a social concern and 4.12 times more likely to report a concern about restricted and repetitive behaviors” than black parents. They didn’t go too deeply into why, but from experience I can think of a few reasons.
First, there is an idea floating through my community that autism is a “white people” condition. The low diagnosis rate in the black community (which has its own reasons below) is cited as the reason for this belief. This is part of a much larger problem with the community: lack of trust in the medical field, and a belief in long disproven theories about autism. I cannot begin to tell you how many times I’ve had to disprove the autism/vaccine connection theory with my own people.
Second, the black and brown communities are simply not getting educated about autism (probably partly due to the reason above). Because of this, they are often unaware of the more obvious symptoms that were mentioned in the article and the study. In many cases, the symptoms are dismissed as the child misbehaving or just being “not quite right” (I’ve heard this one more than I care to admit). This sets up for a later diagnosis, which leads to delayed treatment, which leads to a more difficult time overall.
I hope to be one who expands the awareness and acceptance of autism into my own community; it could help enhance the lives of a still unknown number of autistic individuals that stand in the midst of the African-American community.
Race and Autism Diagnosis study
Article on study by MedicalXress